Second, if you using a pedal assist, you are of course burning calories as you move, but substantially less than on a non-ebike. I would say that all the naysayers on this thread don't have even the faintest idea what they are talking about.įirst, if you are trying to lose weight, eat sensibly and keep fastidious track of your calories, maintain a constant deficit, and pretend as though you're not exercising at all. Should I consider that it was maybe like 20% less because their is some electric assistance? I tracked it this morning, it was roughly 14 kms (mostly flat) in 30 minutes, my weight is 86 kgs and it shows 255 calories. When it's flat/downhill it's probably not much different than with a normal bike, but as I said it's obviously easier on hills, so my hear rate is lower, and I guess it already change the calories in the app. I feel that as the calories burned take my heart rate into account, it's probably not that off. The real difference is that I get much less tired and go faster on hills. I am usually at like 35-38kms/h when it's flat, probably would be at about the same speed and doing the same effort with a normal bike. My bike is one of these electric bikes with an assistance up to 45kms/h, even if a bit too old to be really that powerful. As I need to lose a few kilos in the next few weeks, I started to record calories on myfitnesspal to have an idea of how much I get or burn a day.ĭoes anyone know how much calories it burns, maybe even just using a % of the bike activity? I own a vivoactive 3 and an electric bike, that I now use most days to go to the office.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |